Gordon Brown must be a supporter of “marital rape” and “child abuse”

Posted Apr 29, 2009 by st-michael / comments 0 comments / Print / Font Size Decrease font size Increase font size

Gordon What are you doing?: 700 plus more troops to go to Afghanistan

Gordon What are you doing?: 700 plus more troops to go to Afghanistan

Some 700 plus additional British troops will be sent to Afghanistan to provide security during the forthcoming presidential elections, Gordon Brown, the Prime Minister, has confirmed.

In a Commons statement, Mr Brown said the additional troops, which will take the British force to 9,000, will remain in the country until the autumn.

Gordon Brown must be a supporter of “marital rape” and “child abuse”

Officials made clear that there will be no permanent increase in UK troop numbers, which will return to the current level of 8,300 once the temporary "surge" is over and how many time have we heard that same old story? Instead off put troops in we should be taking them out, as this government which they are trying to protect believes in “marital rape” and “child abuse”? How can any descent Christian society support that? Just when I thought Gordon was going to change his ways and show the world what it was to be a great leader, when someone changes there ways, guess I was wrong

Gordon, who visited Afghanistan and Pakistan earlier this week, said the lawless borderlands between the two countries are a "crucible of global terrorism" which ultimately threatens the security of the UK (And it’s only threading the UK because this British government is interfering?

He echoed US president Barack Obama, who warned that extremism is a "cancer that is killing Pakistan from within" what is wrong with these two men its only a cancer because other countries interfere, this war could have been stopped long ago if Gordon had listened to me?.

Mr Brown was for the first time publishing a strategy document covering both Afghanistan and Pakistan.

He described security in the mountainous borderlands between the two countries as the "greatest priority" for the international community.

"They are the crucible for global terrorism, they are the breeding ground for international terrorists, they are the source of a chain of terror that links the mountains of Afghanistan and Pakistan to the streets of Britain," he said.

He said that, in Afghanistan, Britain's aim was to build up the police and army to ensure that the country's democratic government was strong enough to withstand and overcome the terrorist threat.

The goal would be to achieve a "district-by-district, province-by-province handover" to Afghan control I remember the same word once said about Northern Ireland and British troops are still there nearly 40 years on? 1968/69 the first British troops went into Northern Ireland?

In Pakistan, the focus would be on supporting education and development to prevent young people "falling under the sway of violent and extremist ideologies" while at the same time helping the security forces regain control of the border areas.( which a bit of a joke because this government can’t even do that he in the UK?)

Mr Brown said the Afghan National Army would be strengthened from 80,000 troops to 134,000 by late 2001.

However more work was needed to build up the police, who were not yet seen as an "honest and fair institution", if the rule of law was to be established.

He said that, as the US forces took on an increasing role in southern Afghanistan, UK forces would "shift the balance of our operations away from frontline combat and towards an enhanced contribution to the training" of the police and army.

In Pakistan, he said, much of Britain's £665 million aid, (Which meant English Tax Payers Aid) programme for the next four years - including £125 million of education spending - would be refocused on the border areas, which is more than this government spends on England’s re-education programmes for young and teenage crime that is becoming out of the polices control with there budget been cut as much as 20% per year and now we no why? Its going to Pakistan which by no means is a poor country it may have poor people but so does England but Pakistan wealth in resources it worth more the England’ but as like England the rich get richer and the poor get poorer .

At the same time, he said, senior UK and Pakistani military, intelligence and diplomatic teams would meet on a more regular basis in an "enhanced strategic dialogue"

Closer co-operation would be reinforced through a £10 million counter-terrorism capacity-building programme with the Pakistani police and security services.

Mr Brown said he would continue work on a new "concordat" on strengthening co-operation between the two nations when President Asif Ali Zardari visits Britain next month Gordon when are you going to listen to me, and all these wars could end what a real mess this world is in, it has to be time to change things for the better?

This world is divided into the poor and the rich -- those who long for freedom, and those who have freedom but don’t know what to do with it; those who long for God to come and bring justice, and those who fear that he just might. The Book of Exodus is a testament to both these conditions. It speaks to those for whom freedom is a dream, and to those who sense that freedom is becoming a curse.

The Ten Commandments are a gift to those who have been set free, showing them how they can keep their freedom. They are not an assault course, a barrier to be overcome in order to gain freedom.

Freedom is a gift from God, not something that can be earned by years of striving. The commandments are not a prison in which God places his people, a straitjacket to prevent them from getting above themselves. God has done what Israel could not do

For itself -- he has given it freedom in the crossing of the Red Sea. He now gives his people a second gift -- the means of keeping that freedom. In the process he shows them who he is and what freedom is.

The sequence of events is as follows. God speaks and states a fact: his people are in slavery. This is not the freedom for which he has created them, the freedom to which he has called them. He asks a question: Do you want to be free? He then acts, and delivers his people. The map searching’s and heart searching’s in the wilderness are all exploring what it means to be free and what it means to worship God. The conclusion is that to be free means to be a people who worship God. The goal of freedom is holiness, belonging to God. At Sinai God reveals the destiny of his people: "You shall be for me a priestly kingdom and a holy nation." In other words, just as a priest mediates God to the people, Israel will have the role of mediating God to the world.

So if this world is to be at one with each other, than first it must learn to tolerate each other, it doesn’t matter by what name you call your region, because there is only one God, so if you believe there is a God? then we must all believe in the same God? Then we must all believe in the same in wanting world peace?

Rate this Article:

Be the first to rate me.

  • Nothing Found!

    Why not submit your own content? Signup here.


* You must be logged in order to leave comments, please login or join us.

Comments

No comments yet.



Bookmark and Share
Sign up for our email newsletter
Name:
Email: