Why is Man So Destructive

Posted Apr 22, 2009 by G.Nichols / comments 1 comments / Print / Font Size Decrease font size Increase font size

Everyday the world news gives detail of some destructive nature that man has created within his own society.

      

WHAT IS YOUR POINT OF VIEW ON THIS INHUMAN TOPIC ?

Destructive Nature

Is it just common nature of man to be so destructive or is it hereditary in his blood; Can man be just that angry with himself or others to inflict the terrible end result's after bombing's and gun fights which has 

progressed through years of turmoil. Is there not other way's of expressing your feelings and frustration than taking it out with violence on fellow country men or are these people just that cruel. The majority of victims are innocent men, women and children bystanders passing by in there daily routine. In most peoples eyes around the world these men whom participate in suicide bombings have no respect for themselves or others sentencing themselves to death along with the innocent.

The News Media

 The inhuman nature of bombings have always been highly viewed in the news media and press being the first story aired and pasted on the front page headlines. Yet still in the end one question remains unanswered; "Is there not another resolution to ones concerned issue other than violence ?" Would this    

       

violence not stop if it were not publicized gaining public attention, after all isn't that what these people or groups are trying to accomplish is publicity around the world ? The media in my opinion plays a major role in these groups broad picture of expressing what has been the cause in years of holy wars. I also believe that if there were another way to gain more publicity than taking lives by bombings then these groups would have resorted to it long ago.

Society

I understand society in a whole has many different beliefs in religion but it's just very difficult for me to even imagine that any religious group has religious commandments that endorse the taking lives of others and be decorated in the after life. I respect others and believe everyone is entitled to there own religious beliefs but I have to draw the line at any destructive nature which include taking life's. In my personal beliefs there is only one God who is entitled the empowerment to give and take life without contradiction to another religion. How can anyone endorse a religion that promotes violence in the upbringing of it's children. It's just a failure in social disorder to brain wash children with the techniques of bomb making and weapons handling without them having a choice in social beliefs.

  

These children are not given a choice but breed for one single cause in a revolt to not only let there fellow country men hear but to get a message sent to the entire world.

The Middle East

The Middle East has been for centuries the place of a holy crusade for a purpose far more detailed than most people can even begin to understand. Furthermore, I'm not sure I endorse the U.S. involvement in attempting to resolve there social disorder especially where we have no business of trying to mediate. These people have

and always will include violence as a source of resolving there issues which has yet to be the resolution to any of there disputes. An example of there anger in the U.S. involvement in there issues is the 9/11 Twin towers destruction being a dire moment in history which could have been avoided if the U.S. excluded itself from any participation in Middle East mediation. The truth is that once we remove our troops from the Middle East there can be a possibility of a great uprising from religious groups to over throw the republic guard.

U.S. Involvement

Should the U.s. plant a military base in every country it's invaded ? Are we the social worker of the world or do we just have to make other countries feel inferior to our strength ? How about our inspection teams that

inspect world wide nuclear plants for weapons grade plutonium, when we ourselves maintain several dozen nuclear warhead sites and nuclear subs ? Do we have the right to contradict what each country can and cannot do ? The U.S. acts as the worlds dictators wanting

overall control or say so of who and who cannot. I understand the U.S. maintaining some kind of control does impact certain scenarios from coming abroad. Please feel free to comment your input on this unpleasant topic !

Rate this Article:

Be the first to rate me.

  • Nothing Found!

    Why not submit your own content? Signup here.


* You must be logged in order to leave comments, please login or join us.

Comments

No comments yet.



Bookmark and Share
Sign up for our email newsletter
Name:
Email: